What are some examples of a new issue raised in a reply brief which would provide the examiner the option to file a supplemental examiner's answer?
保存版の掲載情報です。最新の営業状況・料金・利用条件は出典をご確認ください。
保存されている情報
Example 1: The rejection under 35 USC 103 over A in view of B. The brief argues that element 4 of reference B cannot be combined with reference A as it would destroy the function performed by reference A. The reply brief argues that B is nonanalogous and therefore the two references cannot be…
- Current entry point
- Answer details at www.uspto.gov/patents/ptab/faqs, PTAB trials via Patent Center (verified 2026-09-29)
- Legacy system and where it moved
- No site-wide statement on the page (verified 2026-09-29)
- Fee
- Confirmed per answer on the page (no site-wide statement, verified 2026-09-29)
- What you need (account or API key)
- Confirmed per answer on the page (no site-wide statement, verified 2026-09-29)
原データ更新日：2026-10-06
保存版に記録された日付です。今回の実装・デプロイ日ではありません。