Guidelines for Reexamination of Cases in View of In re Portola Packaging, Inc., 110 F.3d 786, 42 USPQ2d 1295 (Fed. Cir. 1997)
The Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) is publishing the final version of guidelines to be used by Office personnel in their review of requests for reexaminations and ongoing reexaminations for compliance with the decision in In re Portola Packaging, Inc., 110 F.3d 786, 42 USPQ2d 1295 (Fed. Cir. 1997). Because these guidelines govern internal practices, they are exempt from notice and comment under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(A).
- Task
- Read the news
- Patent or trademark
- both
- Legacy system
- —
- Current entry point
- www.federalregister.gov/documents/1999/03/31/99-7786/guidelines-for-reexamination-of-cases-in-view-of-in-re-portola-packaging-inc-110-f3d-786-42-uspq2d (permanent link in the Federal Register, verified 2026-09-30)
- Legacy system and where it moved
- No legacy system name mention in title or summary )
- Fee
- No fee mention in title or summary )
- What you need (account or API key)
- No account or key mention in title or summary )
- Published
- 1999-03-31
- Document type
- Notice
- Source
- USPTO documents published in the Federal Register (Federal Register API)(retrieved 2026-10-06)
Everything in the same category
Read the news (all 1988) · both (all 2333)
Related entry points
- Request for Comments on Interim Guidelines for Reexamination of Cases in View of In re Portola Packaging, Inc., 110 F.3d 786, 42 USPQ2d 1295 (Fed. Cir. 1997)
- Utility Examination Guidelines
- Guidelines for the Examination of Claims Directed to Species of Chemical Compositions Based Upon a Single Prior Art Reference
- Guidelines for Examination of Design Patent Applications For Computer-Generated Icons
- Request for Comments on Proposed Utility Examination Guidelines
- Request for Comments on Proposed Examination Guidelines for Computer-Implemented Inventions
- Interim Guidelines for Examination of Design Patent Applications for Computer-Generated Icons
- Revised Utility Examination Guidelines; Request for Comments
- Supplemental Examination Guidelines for Determining the Applicability of 35 U.S.C. 112, ¶ 6
- Guidelines for Assessing Enablement in Utility Applications and Patents in View of the Supreme Court Decision in Amgen Inc. et al. v. Sanofi et al.
- Utility Examination Guidelines
- Request for Comments on Interim Guidelines for Examination of Patent Applications Under the 35 U.S.C. 112 para. 1 ``Written Description'' Requirement
- Revised Interim Guidelines for Examination of Patent Applications Under the 35 U.S.C. Sec. 112, para. 1 ``Written Description'' Requirement; Request for Comments
- Request for Comments on Director Review, Precedential Opinion Panel Review, and Internal Circulation and Review of Patent Trial and Appeal Board Decisions
- Streamlined Patent Reexamination Proceedings; Notice of Public Meeting
- Guidelines for Examination of Patent Applications Under the 35 U.S.C. 112, ¶ 1, “Written Description” Requirement