Cross-Appeals in Patent and Trademark Office Disciplinary Proceedings
保存版の掲載情報です。最新の営業状況・料金・利用条件は出典をご確認ください。
保存されている情報
On July 21, 1993, the Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) proposed amending a rule of practice in practitioner disciplinary proceedings. 58 FR 38994. The proposed rule change provides for a time period for a party to a disciplinary proceeding to file a cross-appeal, after the other party (the respondent or the Director of the Office of Enrollment and Discipline) to the proceeding has appealed from the initial decision of the administrative law judge (ALJ) to the Commissioner. Currently, PTO rules do not provide for such a time period. A party in a disciplinary proceeding may be interested in appealing only if the other party has appealed. Allowing a time period for filing a cross-appeal will give parties to disciplinary cases more flexibility after an initial decision by the administrative [[Page 4396]] law judge and will avoid the necessity of filing contingent appeal simply to preserve rights in the event the other party files an appeal. One comment to the rule change proposed on July 21, 1993, was received suggesting substantive changes. This second notice adopts that suggested change.
- Current entry point
- www.federalregister.gov/documents/1995/01/23/95-1602/cross-appeals-in-patent-and-trademark-office-disciplinary-proceedings (permanent link in the Federal Register, verified 2026-09-30)
- Legacy system and where it moved
- No legacy system name mention in title or summary )
- Fee
- No fee mention in title or summary )
- What you need (account or API key)
- No account or key mention in title or summary )
- Published
- 1995-01-23
- Document type
- Proposed Rule
原データ更新日：2026-10-06
保存版に記録された日付です。今回の実装・デプロイ日ではありません。